A discussion followed between Leo Tilman and Steve Lindo, PRMIA Executive Director, on specific behavioral skills and fundamental knowledge that professional risk managers need to acquire in order to fulfill this role effectively.
Jorge Mina, Co-Head of Risk Management, RiskMetrics
This event is made possible through the generous support of Moody's Analytics and RiskMetrics Group.
Click here for more information on this event or to register.
Posted by PRMIA_Marketing at 11:36 AM
| Comments (0)
March 17, 2009
New PRMIA Complete Course Meets Member Demands
Due to high demand from members, PRMIA is able to offer the Complete Course in Professional Risk Management, its most popular and comprehensive classroom training opportunity, during one week in July 2009.
This program is currently offered as a 20-week course in New York and Washington DC and we are pleased to be partnering with The Kellogg School of Management, one of the world's leading business schools, to offer it in Chicago as an intensive one-week course, allowing for global attendance.
"The curriculum that we have designed with PRMIA will provide practitioners with the most comprehensive overview of risk management available in the marketplace."
- Russell Walker, Assistant Director of the Zell Center at Kellogg
This one-week course is designed to meet the demands of the risk professional by bridging the gap between theory and practice in financial risk management. PRMIA and the Kellogg School's Zell Center for Risk Research jointly offer this classroom-based educational program featuring top faculty from the Kellogg School of Management.
We expect this class to fill quickly, so we encourage you to visit the PRMIA website to learn more or to register. Please contact Jill Fisher at Jill.Fisher@prmia.org with any questions.
Posted by PRMIA_Marketing at 09:53 PM
| Comments (0)
March 16, 2009
Risk as a Profession- Article in a Times of London Supplement
The following article by David Millar, PRMIA's Chief Operating Officer, appeared in a supplement on Enterprise Risk and Continuity Planning appeared in London's The Times newspaper on Tuesday, 10th March 2008.
Risk Management in the Financial Sector: Hero or Villain?
The last six months have seen the greatest crash in wealth since, at least, 1929. In real terms, the Great Crash of that year has been overtaken and the costs to governments, investors and the economies are measured in tens of trillions of dollars.
The history of the current crash has yet to be written, but there are obvious causes that can be identified. Easy and cheap credit created an environment where loans were too easily obtained; the ability to repay was overlooked, and these loans were used to fuel speculation rather than investing in industry. The large profits generated by this lending cycle caused the banks to take ever increasing risks to generate more profits and to keep shareholders and management happy. A bonus culture with no downside caused management at all levels to override caution in the chase for ever increasing earnings.
But this crash has come at the same time as the science of financial risk management has been developing; when global risk management standards have been proposed and partially implemented, and when banks and investment companies have created risk management departments with the specific objective of identifying risk and managing it within acceptable limits.
What went wrong? Did risk management fail?
Risk management in financial institutions has developed from two sources. The practice of evaluation of any business risk has been with us since mankind first started to trade in commodities: crops, metals, livestock, and more recently, money. But this skill was something that good businessmen had, and bad ones did not. There was no formality, no way to compare success, and no attempt to teach this specific skill.
The second source is more recent and began with the application of probability to financial markets in the 1920s and the development of financial modelling. This led to the development of value at risk (VAR) by J P Morgan in 1994: the analysis of volatility in asset prices and the correlation of relationship across different assets. VAR has become the standard risk management tool across the financial industry.
But the two sources were never adequately combined. VAR is only a tool of probability, not the end product of the risk management process. VAR depends on the models being both accurate and, critically, comprehensive. This does not work for risks that are hard to quantify, such as management practices and herd behaviour, and it does not succeed in correlating systemic risks across industry participants.
Nor was VAR much use in liquidity issues. A bank's bond may be given a price in the future; but what value is that calculated price if buyers believe, perhaps incorrectly, that the bank is in trouble? And can banks step off the liquidity treadmill? There is a famous quote by Charles Prince, ex-CEO of Citigroup: "When the music stops, in terms of liquidity, things will be complicated. But as long as the music is playing, you've got to get up and dance. We're still dancing." The music has long since stopped.
Did risk management fail? John Wisbey, Chairman and CEO of Lombard Risk, a global leader in bank regulatory software, says "The crisis was due to a unique failure of regulators and politicians to foresee the systemic risk issues that struck so quickly, and a failure by both senior bankers and risk managers to prepare for those risks. The massive fall in the value of even some AAA rated mortgage-backed securities, combined with an equally massive contraction in liquidity, was something that few firms would have contemplated even assuming their models could cope with it."
There are many tools out there. There are financial models for parts of the risk area, and market risk; the correlation of prices, interest rates and foreign exchange values is well developed. Hedge funds have developed a successful industry on the back of market risk modelling, and this industry, without government backing, could be said to have withstood the downturn better than the big banks.
But standards and best practices must be improved. Existing tools must be evaluated and incorporated into a wider set of standards which will enable those who manage banks to take decisions, whilst understanding all the aspects of risk. Where the standards are lacking: liquidity risk, remuneration practices, correlation of risks, etc, that lack should be identified and a process to fill the gap started.
There may be excellent tools for parts of the risk management constituency: disaster protection, data management, incident reporting, credit scoring, etc but there are no tools or standards that bring all the risks together and help in the understanding of their interrelationships. Managers with the time, experience and training to be able to weigh all the risks in a bank and to be able to communicate recommendations to the business team are rare. Nor is there any easy way for regulators to measure the risks across banks if every bank manages risk in a different way.
But standards and tools alone will not solve the problems and prevent or reduce the impact of the next crisis. We need to look at those tasked with the management of risks within banks.
Tom Wilson, Chief Risk Officer (CRO) at Allianz says "The main challenge facing CROs is not whether technical models are correct: a good CRO, understanding that models are abstractions of reality, will know how to combine common sense, simple rules and solid business experience to compensate. The most important challenge for good CROs is to influence management (and shareholders) that sitting out an occasional dance, and not being at the top of the league tables or bonus pool charts regardless of competitors behaviour, may actually be in their best interests in the longer run."
A key issue has been the inability of CROs to influence management and the business. This could be because the risk manager is too low in the hierarchy to have the required influence. An example of this could be the allegation that Paul Moore, the ex-group Head of Regulatory Risk at HBOS had his recommendations overridden and was fired, to be replaced by a less experienced individual.
Others may have been infected by the money-making enthusiasm around them. Many risk managers were simply ex-trading managers, and ignored the risks because they stood to make their bonuses from today's profits or because they did not feel strong enough nor have enough incentive to stem the tide. Or maybe they had insufficient business experience and lacked formal risk management training? Wilson says "Important in addressing these issues is to make sure that the risk function is populated with experienced individuals who combine a good sense for the business with integrity, communication and management skills, in addition to possessing strong technical skills".
In the short term there is no doubt that work needs to be done on improving the risk management risk standards and best practices. We need to identify the mistakes that happened and to learn from those who moved against the tide. And those missing but monumental risks that the models ignore as too difficult: management practices, herd behaviour, market panic, strategic board decisions and government intervention to name but a few, need to be brought into risk practices, even if they are unquantified, and even unquantifiable.
And more needs to be done. Once new standards are developed, they need to accepted by all in a consistent fashion. We accept the need for a common and consistent set of accounting rules. Why not the same for risk management?
No one disagrees that a CFO must have an accounting qualification. So why do we not insist that a CRO and his team have relevant risk management qualifications? Remember the ex-leaders of RBS and HBOS having to admit to the Treasury Committee that they had no banking qualifications? Risk managers should not escape the need for a good and wide basis of risk management knowledge, and this can be achieved only by formal qualifications.
And we need to ensure that risk management is right up there in board and senior management decisions. The best way to do this is to create a risk management committee, lead by a suitably qualified CRO. Returning to the accounting simile: why not a Risk Committee run along the same lines as the Audit Committee?
In the long term, risk management will succeed only if it is treated as a profession, not a skill learnt by experience. This requires professional standards, suitably qualified risk managers, statutory risk committees and risk returns, and eventually, even external risk audits. Only then will risk management play its required part in reducing the risk of failure in our banks.
David Millar is the Chief Operating Officer at the Professional Risk Managers' International Association - www.prmia.org.
The full version of this supplement can be read at http://np.netpublicator.com/netpublication/n63059333.
The supplement was published by London based publishing house, Raconteur (www.raconteurmedia.co.uk) who produce independent special interest reports exclusively for The Times and The Sunday Times.
Posted by kgittins at 12:45 PM
| Comments (0)
March 05, 2009
PRMIA Announces New Training Webinar - Effective Leadership for Risk Professionals
Leo M. Tilman, president of strategic advisory firm L.M. Tilman & Co., lecturer at Columbia University, former Chief Institutional Strategist at Bear Sterns, and author of Financial Darwinism: Create Value or Self-Destruct in a World of Risk will discuss risk management's influence on high-stakes business decisions in his conversation with PRMIA's Executive Director, Steve Lindo.
Effective Leadership for Risk Professionals, a 60-minute webinar, consists of a discussion in which Tilman will make a short presentation and then answer questions about the persisting disconnect between strategic decisions and risk management across the financial industry. The webinar will take place March 26 at 8:30 a.m. EST.
In addition to discussing new ideas on explicitly linking risk management and economic value creation, he will address the role, skills, and resource needs of risk professionals that should make them more effective in influencing high-stakes business decisions and give them an equal seat at the table where corporate and investment strategies are formulated. The discussion will include the following topics and a segment reserved for questions from participants.
